Remember Me
 
 
 
 
 
 
Content by Issue
Content by Author
Preview... In Stores Now
Subscribe Now!
Digital Bluff Magazine

zip code:
 


 

Overcoming a competitive nature

  

by Annie Duke


March 2006

My parents met across a card table, over a game of bridge, when my mother’s regular game needed a fourth. I guess, given the inception of my parents’ romance, competitiveness and a love of cards was bred into my brother and me. From the moment we entered the world, we had a desire to win and our parents encouraged that desire. Nature and nurture worked in perfect synergy to create children who wanted nothing more than to win at our family’s nightly card games.

My father was a ranked regional amateur tennis player. If anyone needs an insight into the crazy competitiveness of the household my brother Howard and I were brought up in, they need look no further than a father who wanted to win at all costs, even his health. During the humid New Hampshire summers, he would go to the finals of his regional tennis matches and become dehydrated, his electrolytes totally out of balance. My father, cramping and barely able to move without extreme pain, would finish every match, grimacing as he ran for every ball, fighting through the pain to win, no matter what. As soon as he finished, we would rush him to the hospital to get poked with IVs until his body came back.

Until I started playing poker, the desire to win bled into everything I did. When I played games with my family, I would generally lose. My sister was too young to play, so I was always the youngest in the game. I never seemed to outsmart my elder brother or my father, and the evenings would invariably end with me throwing a tantrum, whipping the cards against the wall or overturning a game board, in tears.

When it came to relationships, I was the same way. I had to win at everything, win every argument, no matter how insignificant. I always had to be right. I had to have the best grades among all my peers. As you can imagine, this attitude did not make me too popular. That strong a desire to win is not a recipe for healthy and long-lasting friendships or relationships. If the goal is always to win, it is difficult to sustain a healthy friendship, because a healthy friendship requires give and take.

I think most people would assume that being a professional poker player would increase one’s competitive desire. Poker, after all, is competition in its purest form. There is no team, no cooperative play. It is every gal for herself; and crushing your opponents is not only part of the game, it is the goal itself. But poker teaches you that winning isn’t everything, at least in the short run. Poker teaches you that what matters is making good decisions and, if you do that, everything will work itself out in the end.

When I first starting playing in Billings, Montana, I would become so upset by losses that I would drive home in tears, and immediately call my brother to moan about my bad luck, how nothing went right. My brother pounded it into my head that I had to stop this, that that kind of reaction to losing was counterproductive to winning at poker. He worked with me for hours to calm my competitiveness, the desire to win every hand, every session, the tendency to become veritably unhinged by losing.

We all know we make the best decisions when they are unemotional. Becoming unhinged by losing a hand puts you in an emotional state and if you carry that into the next hand, or worse, the rest of the session, or even worse than that, the next session you play, you will be playing a lot of hours under circumstances in which you are not a good decisionmaker.

It was my competitive streak that unhinged me when I lost. I had to learn that making good decisions and getting my money in pots with the best hand were my real goals. I had to learn a longterm view, an understanding that winning at a particular moment, winning a particular hand, is not what it’s about. The goal is to win in the long run by playing well and understanding that part of the game is that you will lose sometimes.

At limit poker, you will lose somewhere between 40 to 45% of the time if you are a very good player. That is enough to make money.

It is also enough to derange a person who cannot stand to lose…ever.

So I learned to lose at poker. I learned to let it all go. I learned to always look toward the long run and only get upset when I played badly, win or lose. That made me a much better player and allowed me to maximize the number of hours I played while emotionally steady, under the best circumstances for making good decisions.

And so I learned to lose in life. I learned that these principles do not apply just to poker; that allowing your partner or your friend to win is a good thing in the long term.

I learned that I don’t need to win every argument; I just need to win the ones that are really important to me.

I could never have done that without the lessons poker taught me. And I’m so thankful for that, as my life is so much more complete and happy because of the wonderful friends I have.

Being less competitive is poker’s gift to me.




View Comments (0) Post Comments  

 

 
 
 

POKER MAGAZINE | POKER MAGAZINE ARCHIVES | POKER TOURNAMENTS | POKER RANKINGS | ONLINE POKER RANKINGS | POKER NEWS | thepokerdb
POKER FORUM | POKER RULES | ONLINE TOURNAMENT SCHEDULE | POKER TOOLS AND TIPS | TOS | BLUFF MEDIA | MAGAZINE MEDIA KIT | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE